FEDERAL “CHECKBOOK” 

FEBRUARY 2, 2025

ELON MUSK’S BID FOR THE FEDERAL “CHECKBOOK”: WHAT IT MEANS FOR AMERICAN TAXPAYERS


Permit me to issue and control the money of a nation, and I care not who makes its laws.” — Mayer Amschel Rothschild


Elon Musk has long been celebrated as a disruptor in private enterprise—from revolutionizing electric vehicles and space travel to reshaping social media. However, recent reports suggest that his influence may soon extend into the heart of American government finance. Allegations have emerged that Musk and his surrogates are seeking access to one of the most sensitive systems in the United States Treasury: the payment system that disburses trillions of dollars every year. This system processes Social Security, Medicare benefits, federal salaries, tax refunds, and government contractor payments. For taxpayers, the potential implications are profound.


According to a breaking news transcript from a recent report, a top-ranking Treasury official resigned following a dispute over Musk’s team’s request for access to this payment system. The Treasury system—often referred to as the government’s “checkbook”—is considered one of the most secure and critical components of federal financial infrastructure. Traditionally, only a handful of career officials have managed its operations, ensuring that payments are executed as authorized by Congress. The resignation of David Lebryk, the official at the center of this dispute, has raised immediate alarms about what might be at stake.


Critics argue that granting Musk or his proxies unfettered access could lead to drastic shifts in how government funds are managed. In a speculative, albeit nefarious scenario, such access could be exploited to redirect funds into private ventures, undermine institutional oversight, or even subtly influence political outcomes by manipulating payment flows. While there is no conclusive evidence that Musk intends to misuse the system, the mere possibility underscores a critical need for robust safeguards.


At the heart of these concerns is the emergence of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), a Trump-administration initiative co-opted by Musk. DOGE’s purported mission is to cut wasteful spending and modernize federal technology—but it has also become a vehicle for Musk’s expansive ambitions. Reports indicate that Musk’s allies have already sought access to Treasury databases that process $6 trillion annually, leading to heated debates among lawmakers and career officials alike. Senate Finance Committee Ranking Member Ron Wyden has been vocal in his criticism, warning that any politically motivated meddling with the payment system risks severe economic damage. In his recent letter to Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, Wyden underscored the danger of granting politically connected personnel, especially those tied to controversial figures with international business interests, unfettered access to the federal checkbook.


For American voters, the stakes are high. The integrity of our financial infrastructure—and by extension, the stability of essential government services—could be compromised if critical checks and balances are weakened. Taxpayers deserve transparency and accountability when it comes to the handling of public funds. The potential for abuse, whether through direct mismanagement or covert redirection of funds, must be addressed with stringent oversight and legislative safeguards.



CALLS TO ACTION FOR VOTERS:







As Musk’s influence continues to permeate multiple facets of public life, it is imperative that American voters remain vigilant. Whether his intentions are genuinely rooted in efficiency or marred by hidden agendas, the conversation around the security and oversight of our federal payment systems is one that affects every taxpayer in the nation. Now is the time to demand accountability, transparency, and robust protections for the integrity of our financial infrastructure.

THE GLOSS

  • Elon Musk is trying to control a government system that handles huge amounts of money for benefits and salaries, which could let him steer funds to favor his own interests.

  • Many worry that if he gains this power, it will keep a small, rich group in charge, echoing long-standing systems that have favored white people over others.

  • This struggle shows how old, unfair power structures still work today by letting the rich and powerful control money and resources.

  • We need to demand that our leaders protect our public funds and ensure that everyone benefits fairly, not just a few powerful people.

UPDATES